On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Andrew Morgan wrote: > They are all captured. They are all in this bug report: > > http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=124930&group_id=6663 Thanks for the response, which is appreciated. But let's just check. I had previously understood that you wanted bug reports and/or patches as separate items (message "<3A35147D.26DB5B91@transmeta.com>" 11 December). That is, "n" separate items should be reported as such, not as a single megalith containing the "n" items intertwined.) But now it seems all the separate items I submitted have become lumped together not only with each other, but with another major item. Also, two of my items (configure.in: "WXWYZ...mon" => "WXYZ...mno" ; pam_unix/support.c: utmp) had already been done, and a third (pam_filter/Makefile: "[ -e ...") is now under discussion with Steve L. Of the remainder, one was definitely small and isolated (e.g. pam_access/pam_access.c: "gethostbyname()"), whereas another probably might have a wider implications (-D_POSIX_SOURCE) and another (pam_mail/pam_mail.c: "scandir()") is again isolated, though larger in magnitude. Given that these items are independent, I'm not convinced that they should be lumped together. -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : University of Durham : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham : : Phone: +44 191 374 2882 U.K. :
