On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:07:18PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:56:39 +0100 >> Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Eric Dumazet wrote: >>>> Patrick McHardy a écrit : >>>>> Eric Dumazet wrote: >>>>>> real 0m1.810s >>>>>> user 0m0.000s >>>>>> sys 0m0.001s >>>>> Thats really slow ... >>>>> >>>>>> CONFIG_NO_HZ=y >>>>>> CONFIG_HZ_1000=y >>>>>> CONFIG_HZ=1000 >>>>>> >>>>>> One cpu is 100% handling softirqs, could it be the problem ? >>>>> Is this fixed by your RCU quiescent state fix? >>>> Yes it is :) >>> Great, thanks :) >> I wonder if the RCU quiescent fix should go in 2.6.29 because it >> fixes other issues like route changing RCU latency under Dos attack. > > From what I can tell, it should. I agree. Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
