Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:56:39 +0100
Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eric Dumazet wrote:
Patrick McHardy a écrit :
Eric Dumazet wrote:
real 0m1.810s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.001s
Thats really slow ...
CONFIG_NO_HZ=y
CONFIG_HZ_1000=y
CONFIG_HZ=1000
One cpu is 100% handling softirqs, could it be the problem ?
Is this fixed by your RCU quiescent state fix?
Yes it is :)
Great, thanks :)
I wonder if the RCU quiescent fix should go in 2.6.29 because it
fixes other issues like route changing RCU latency under Dos attack.
From what I can tell, it should.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
