On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:56:39 +0100 Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Patrick McHardy a écrit : > >> Eric Dumazet wrote: > >>> real 0m1.810s > >>> user 0m0.000s > >>> sys 0m0.001s > >> Thats really slow ... > >> > >>> CONFIG_NO_HZ=y > >>> CONFIG_HZ_1000=y > >>> CONFIG_HZ=1000 > >>> > >>> One cpu is 100% handling softirqs, could it be the problem ? > >> Is this fixed by your RCU quiescent state fix? > > > > Yes it is :) > > Great, thanks :) I wonder if the RCU quiescent fix should go in 2.6.29 because it fixes other issues like route changing RCU latency under Dos attack. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
