Stephen Hemminger a écrit : > On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:56:39 +0100 > Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Eric Dumazet wrote: >>> Patrick McHardy a écrit : >>>> Eric Dumazet wrote: >>>>> real 0m1.810s >>>>> user 0m0.000s >>>>> sys 0m0.001s >>>> Thats really slow ... >>>> >>>>> CONFIG_NO_HZ=y >>>>> CONFIG_HZ_1000=y >>>>> CONFIG_HZ=1000 >>>>> >>>>> One cpu is 100% handling softirqs, could it be the problem ? >>>> Is this fixed by your RCU quiescent state fix? >>> Yes it is :) >> Great, thanks :) > > I wonder if the RCU quiescent fix should go in 2.6.29 because it > fixes other issues like route changing RCU latency under Dos attack. > > Yes probably, and on stable versions too, since this problem is quite old... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
