Patrick McHardy a écrit : > Eric Dumazet wrote: >> # time iptables -nvL >> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 416M packets, 64G bytes) >> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source >> destination >> >> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) >> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source >> destination >> >> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 401M packets, 62G bytes) >> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source >> destination >> >> real 0m1.810s >> user 0m0.000s >> sys 0m0.001s > > Thats really slow ... > >> CONFIG_NO_HZ=y >> CONFIG_HZ_1000=y >> CONFIG_HZ=1000 >> >> One cpu is 100% handling softirqs, could it be the problem ? > > Is this fixed by your RCU quiescent state fix? Yes it is :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html