On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 12:21:45AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> > ------------------------------------------------------ > >> > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Subject: mm-page_alloc-protect-pcp-lists-with-a-spinlock-fix > >> > Date: Thu Jul 7 01:06:35 PM PDT 2022 > >> > > >> > add missing local_unlock_irqrestore() on contention path > >> > >> Doh, that's true and something to fix, although patch 7 did remove the bug > >> later in the same series so that wouldn't explain the lkp report for patch > >> 7. The reason lkp test robot complained was AFAICS that it was testing v4, > >> as I just replied there. > > > > Sorry I didn't bother to reply until now: it did test v5, at this > > commit, not the whole series. > > I meant this report that appears to be for v4 (full series including patch 7): > https://lore.kernel.org/all/YsFk%2FqU+QtWun04h@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/ > That reported a bug due to missing unpin that was previously reported for v4 > and fixed in v5. > > I'm not aware of a lkp report for v5 (found only Dan's) but yeah, hitting > the (similar but not identical) bug fixed by this -fix would indeed be > possible in v5 if patch 7 was not applied. My report is the LKP report? Some of the Smatch warnings from LKP get sent to me and then I look them over and either delete them or hit forward. I don't have visibility into the LKP process more than just looking over the warnings so I can't say how it picks which patches to test off the mailing list. regards, dan carpenter
