On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 3:58 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 7/7/22 22:09, Andrew Morton wrote: > > The patch titled > > Subject: mm-page_alloc-protect-pcp-lists-with-a-spinlock-fix > > has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is > > mm-page_alloc-protect-pcp-lists-with-a-spinlock-fix.patch > > > > This patch will shortly appear at > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-page_alloc-protect-pcp-lists-with-a-spinlock-fix.patch > > > > This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm > > > > Before you just go and hit "reply", please: > > a) Consider who else should be cc'ed > > b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well > > c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a > > reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's > > > > *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** > > > > The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything > > branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm > > and is updated there every 2-3 working days > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: mm-page_alloc-protect-pcp-lists-with-a-spinlock-fix > > Date: Thu Jul 7 01:06:35 PM PDT 2022 > > > > add missing local_unlock_irqrestore() on contention path > > Doh, that's true and something to fix, although patch 7 did remove the bug > later in the same series so that wouldn't explain the lkp report for patch > 7. The reason lkp test robot complained was AFAICS that it was testing v4, > as I just replied there. Sorry I didn't bother to reply until now: it did test v5, at this commit, not the whole series.
