On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:20:22 +0100, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That's a good point. What about replacing BUILD by KBUILD meaning this > macro is coming from Kbuild itsel ? No objections. > And maybe it would be interesting to make obvious that this macro > implies 64-bits kernel. What about something like KBUILD_64BIT_SYM32 > and replace 'BUILD_ELF32=no' by 'KBUILD_SYM32=no' ? Same here. I just think introducing one name is better than two name. I also feel "make KBUILD_SYM32=0" is more consistent. --- Atsushi Nemoto
