Re: [PATCH 2/3] Automatically set CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64

["Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 2/14/07, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Same here.  I just think introducing one name is better than two name.
> I also feel "make KBUILD_SYM32=0" is more consistent.

Yes I agree KBUILD_SYM32 seems better for command line usage but I
think it won't be used widely unlike in code usage where
KBUILD_64BIT_SYM32 is better because it's really self explaned and not
ambigous: "build a 64 bits kernel with 32 bits symbols".

And I think it's more important.

--
              Franck