On 2/14/07, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:09:32 +0100, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It should be done by patch #3 instead where CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 is
> renamed into CONFIG_64BIT_BUILD_ELF32. Any suggestions for a better
> name ?
I think "ELF32" or "ELF64" word is improper while this is irrelevant
to ELF format. This makes confusion with CONFIG_BOOT_ELF32.
How about simple BUILD_SYM32? And replase BUILD_ELF32 with
BUILD_SYM32 too?
That's a good point. What about replacing BUILD by KBUILD meaning this
macro is coming from Kbuild itsel ?
And maybe it would be interesting to make obvious that this macro
implies 64-bits kernel. What about something like KBUILD_64BIT_SYM32
and replace 'BUILD_ELF32=no' by 'KBUILD_SYM32=no' ?
--
Franck
