On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:09:32 +0100, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It should be done by patch #3 instead where CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 is > renamed into CONFIG_64BIT_BUILD_ELF32. Any suggestions for a better > name ? I think "ELF32" or "ELF64" word is improper while this is irrelevant to ELF format. This makes confusion with CONFIG_BOOT_ELF32. How about simple BUILD_SYM32? And replase BUILD_ELF32 with BUILD_SYM32 too? --- Atsushi Nemoto
