Re: the hell of Maemo repos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:47:47 +0100
"sebastian maemo" <sebastian.maemo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Before Nokia tried to "consolidate" any repo my problem didn't
> exist... My problem came with Nokia's decision... So though they're
> indirectly responsible for that... (from my point of view, of course).

Again, Nokia don't tried consolidate any repo, the pushing of the
extras repository was because the Maemo Comunnity want it.

I didn't see anyone complaint when it was proposed, you should have
explained your reasons when it happened.


> And *that* is up to repo owners. Repo owner took
> > repo offline - ask them.
> 
> 
> I don't agree with that.

If the developer agree with upload her packages to extras and 
close her repository, but the developer close her own repository without
upload the packages to extras...


- -- 
Daniel Martin Yerga
http://yerga.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkkoWWkACgkQcnvB1T3xmfOd2wCdE6l8DIbvJWtvMpBnpK1Wy7CR
j/QAoIATuphGIOPUHWJRNsdcQrRlVvEB
=EpHZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]    

  Powered by Linux