On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 07:04:56 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 09:21:02AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi Fred, > > > > Please don't top-post. > > > > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:15:03 +0200, Fred . wrote: > > > I am sorry tha I do not have the nescesary equipment nor skill set in > > > order to be able to help test > > > or contribute with code. > > > > > > Now since the interface definition is upstreams, I hope that someone > > > may implement the feature > > > in at least one of the drivers. > > > > This is done now: the new w83795 hardware monitoring driver implements > > the standard intrusion detection interface. > > > > I have written user-space code to use that interface. I have two > > patches, one for libsensors, one for sensors, both apply on top of > > lm-sensors SVN, if anyone wants to give them a try. I've attached them. > > They work OK for me, I'll commit them soon unless someone finds and > > reports a problem with them. > > > > Then we will have to convert the remaining drivers. I found 3 drivers > > which need to be converted: adm9240, w83792d and w83793. If there are > > more, please let me know. > > > Reminds me. I have a set of patches for those almost ready for submission. > Hope you didn't do the same work ;). I just did :( I should have read my mail earlier. Well at least we'll see if we agree on what needs to be done and how to do it. > > Code below looks ok. Thanks for the review. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
