On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 08:55:46AM -0400, Fred . wrote: > http://www.lm-sensors.org/ticket/2370 > Ticket says the interface definition is now upstream. > It is. > http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/ProjectInformation > However the Project Information page says it still is not standardized yet. > > Why is this? Which is right? Perhaps the Project Information page > isn't updated? Or am I missing something? > > Also, has there been any more progress. > > Since the interface definition is upstreams, why have not support been > added to libsensors and sensors? > Browsing through the drivers, it seems that none have been converted to use the new interface. I would guess that until that has been done, it does not make sense to add untestable support for it to libsensors. Please keep in mind that most of the work done in the linux kernel is voluntary. Especially work like this, which is a bit out of mainstream. You are always invited to make a contribution yourself, modify the drivers as needed, and submit your patches. Including, of course, libsensors. Thanks, Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
