On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 11:12:36AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Axel, Hans, all, > > On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:28:46 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 08:53:43PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > Agreed, thinking about this some more I'm not so sure that dropping 2.4 > > > support is a good idea as there is still plenty of 2.4 usage out there. > > > > I would second keeping 2.4 support if it's not too much pain. > Come on, I'm tired of all this whining each time we say that we want > to drop 2.4 support. [...] The drop of 2.4 support is a fact > already. We are no longer writing new drivers for 2.4, and when 2.4 > drivers are backported by others (w83627ehf, smsc47m192) we don't > have the time to review them anyway. > > But if 2.4 support is slowing down things and developer resources > > want to concentrate on 2.6 it will have to go sooner or later. > > That's the case exactly. We hardly have time to keep up with the new > drivers for 2.6 and all the infrastrcuture changes that are long > overdue. I'm instantly redrawing my just-nice-to-have-if-its-no-pain request. :) Many thanks for keeping this project up and fresh! I agree that if RHEL3 consumers are interested then they should be able to throw in resources. But that's not going to happen. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20070312/fdbf2e30/attachment.bin
