On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 08:53:43PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Agreed, thinking about this some more I'm not so sure that dropping 2.4 > support is a good idea as there is still plenty of 2.4 usage out there. I would second keeping 2.4 support if it's not too much pain. Many RHEL3 users pick i2c/lm_sensors' kernel modules at ATrpms for supporting their hardware. But if 2.4 support is slowing down things and developer resources want to concentrate on 2.6 it will have to go sooner or later. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20070311/6ee2ec35/attachment.bin
