Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > *If* the chip looks very much like an lm85 or an ATDT7463, *and* you get us > a full datasheet, we can try to do a spec-sheet-based change to lm85 and > carefully review it before you try. At least it shouldn't oops the kernel > :-) and chances are it will actually work fine. I don't know how much like previous chip it looks, I was merely shamelessly quoting Jean Delvare (see <http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2005-November/014458.html>). As for the datasheet, the job of looking has already been done for me by the lm-sensors folk ;-) the 'new drivers' page mentions: <http://www.analog.com/en/prod/0%2C2877%2CADT7476%2C00.html> which includes a link to a what is described as a data sheet (I have zero idea whether it includes the relevant datas, but it does include 72 pages of technical stuff I understand nothing about) : <http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/Data_Sheets/402263009ADT7476_a.pdf> Whenever there's some code to try, I can schedule some downtime to test (I just can't do it too often). Thanks for your help, -- Romain Dolbeau <romain at dolbeau.org>
