On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 08:13:27AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > > > Individual diffs are good. In an incremental fashion is even > > > > better(this one fixes up the core files to match cvs, this one > > > > adds one driver, etc...) > > > > > > OK, let's go. > > > > At first glance, this looks really good. > > Note however that what I sent was build against i2c-CVS, not i2c-2.8.0 > yet (I mean, the core patch). And Linux 2.4.21-bk will evolve by the > time we really submit a patch. So I will regenerate the patch when you > are ready. > > > But I'm strapped for time, trying to finish up stuff in time for OLS > > and the kernel summit next week, so I'm not going to have a chance to > > really look at it for about a week or so. > > > > It's in my todo box, so I will get too it, sorry for the delay... > > No problem. I was just astonished because you seemed to think it was > kind of urgent, and then no more answer. But I know we all have many > many things to do and we have to choose priorities. That's life! As long > as I did not work for nothing, it's OK. It's not for nothing. The speed of the 2.4.22-pre development tree just supprised me, so we've missed this window. We should aim for 2.4.23-pre1, sound ok? thanks, greg k-h
