> It's not for nothing. The speed of the 2.4.22-pre development tree > just supprised me, so we've missed this window. I suppose they try to avoid the long cycle they had for .21-pre, the same way we will make sure lm_sensors 2.8.1 is our before seven more months pass by. > We should aim for 2.4.23-pre1, sound ok? It's OK for me. I will regenerate a set of patches for 2.4.22 when it's out, so that our users can keep using both lm_sensors and other i2c devices while still using the latest stable kernel. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
