> > > Individual diffs are good. In an incremental fashion is even > > > better(this one fixes up the core files to match cvs, this one > > > adds one driver, etc...) > > > > OK, let's go. > > At first glance, this looks really good. Note however that what I sent was build against i2c-CVS, not i2c-2.8.0 yet (I mean, the core patch). And Linux 2.4.21-bk will evolve by the time we really submit a patch. So I will regenerate the patch when you are ready. > But I'm strapped for time, trying to finish up stuff in time for OLS > and the kernel summit next week, so I'm not going to have a chance to > really look at it for about a week or so. > > It's in my todo box, so I will get too it, sorry for the delay... No problem. I was just astonished because you seemed to think it was kind of urgent, and then no more answer. But I know we all have many many things to do and we have to choose priorities. That's life! As long as I did not work for nothing, it's OK. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
