On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Jean Delvare wrote: > > The drivers for the I2C and DCC Busses don't work (at least on my > > Computer). > > > > With ver 2.7.0 nothing worked and no devices were detected by > > i2cdetect. But i2c-algo-bit's bit_test succeded. > > How can you say it succeeded if you were not able to load any bus > driver? Well, 'nothing' is not very clear, my mistake.... I didn't mean that I was unable to load it. I wanted to say that the driver didn't work. > > With ver 2.8.0 my Chrontel TV encoder was detected, but > > communication did not work and i2c-algo-bit's bit_test failed. > > (SDA stuck high). The driver got the first ACK (after sending the > > DAB), but never got the second one after sending the RAB. > > > > Using the attached patch everything works. > Could you tell us how you did come to the values you are using? We can't > apply a patch unless we fully understand what it does. The set family is Yes I know... :-) I found these values by disassembling the programm mentioned here: http://www.maersk-moller.net/projects/familynet/TV-Out.html So I have no idea about the meaning of the individual bits. The values as defined at the moment are not working on my computer, thats way I guess they're wrong. > the same in 2.7.0 and 2.8.0. Only the get family was changed. Please > take a look at the attached patch and tell us if reverting this part is > enough to get the driver to work again for you. ??? Then I will have 2.7.0 again... And this version doesn't work, as stated in my first message. > Also, could you tell us which chip driver is used for your tv encoder? > And is your monitor DDC capable or not? No my monitor is not DDC capable. But i810 has two busses. It tested this modification only on the I2C bus. But I really hope the behaviour is the same for the DDC Channel. There is no chip driver for the TV Encoder. But there is a userspace programm: http://tumult.textalk.se/chp3258.html BTW: The patch you can download there didn't work for me. Maybe you could just put this patch in a contrib directory, for further evalution... I don't know.... I just thought I sould send it to you, because it took me a lot of time to get it working....
