On 28 February 2013 05:09, Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The same could be said of PID... > I agree, we should remove that one as well. One of the advantages of having multiple RC modules - even if they're not longer optimal - is to keep the API honest. :-) I still keep onoe/amrr working in FreeBSD's ath(4) driver, primarily to make sure that I don't change the API without thinking too much about what other rate control modules do, but also to provide a simpler example of how the API works. Personally, I'd like to see more examples of rate control modules in LInux/FreeBSD, especially ones that start demanding more 802.11 state (ie, air-time QoS.) Adrian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
