On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:24:49AM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2013-02-28 3:21 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > It may not be a bad idea to keep it around as a reference and for > > people to do comparisons against. It just seems silly to have a rate > > control framework and then not use it.. > I don't see the point in keeping that algorithm around. It has known > design flaws that make it perform poorly in several scenarios, and > fixing some of the flaws require basically rewriting it. The same could be said of PID... -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
