On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:53:50PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2013-02-08 5:38 PM, Paul Stewart wrote: > > Could you share some of the test results? I know with ChromeOS when > > we switched to 3.4, the first thing that tipped us off to the fact > > that we had inadvertently switch to minstrel was that our RvR > > throughput values had dropped significantly. Has anyone done an RvR > > comparison between minstrel and the ath9k internal rate control > > lately? > Are you sure it was minstrel_ht, or could it also have been minstrel > (the legacy version)? I don't have any recent RvR test results, however > on every single link that I tested both rate control modules on (leaving > everything else unchanged), minstrel_ht got slightly better results. > Additionally, I occasionally get asked for help on debugging low > throughput issues, and many of the people asking me have reported that > simply switching to minstrel_ht fixed these issues in their tests. > > I would also like to see some real RvR tests comparing both, preferably > before this gets merged, which is why I sent it as RFC. Paul, curious if you've run any tests? Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
