On 2013-02-28 3:21 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Why don't we just move the ath9k rate control code to another mac80211 > rate control module, so it's available to other devices? > > It may not be a bad idea to keep it around as a reference and for > people to do comparisons against. It just seems silly to have a rate > control framework and then not use it.. I don't see the point in keeping that algorithm around. It has known design flaws that make it perform poorly in several scenarios, and fixing some of the flaws require basically rewriting it. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
