On 2013-02-28 12:47 PM, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:24:49AM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> On 2013-02-28 3:21 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> > It may not be a bad idea to keep it around as a reference and for >> > people to do comparisons against. It just seems silly to have a rate >> > control framework and then not use it.. >> I don't see the point in keeping that algorithm around. It has known >> design flaws that make it perform poorly in several scenarios, and >> fixing some of the flaws require basically rewriting it. > > The same could be said of PID... I agree, we should remove that one as well. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
