On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Gabor Juhos <juhosg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2012.12.07. 0:02 keltezéssel, Luis R. Rodriguez írta: >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Gabor Juhos <juhosg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> @@ -416,19 +423,26 @@ static u32 ath9k_patch_initval(u32 idx, u32 val) >>> return val; >>> } >>> >>> -static void ath9k_hw_print_initval(const char *name, const u32 *array, u32 rows, u32 columns, bool onedim) >>> +static void ath9k_hw_print_initval(const char *name, const u32 *array, u32 rows, >>> + u32 columns, bool onedim, bool wide) >>> { >>> - u32 p_columns = columns > 5 ? 5 : columns; >>> + u32 p_columns; >>> u32 col, row; >>> >>> - /* >>> - * This checksum stuff is designed for columns <= 8), >>> - * and spreads the checksum over 64 bits but since currently >>> - * the initval max column size is 6 we only use the first 48 >>> - * bits. >>> - */ >>> - if (columns > 6) >>> - return; >>> + if (wide) { >>> + p_columns = columns; >>> + } else { >>> + p_columns = columns > 5 ? 5 : columns; >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * This checksum stuff is designed for columns <= 8), >>> + * and spreads the checksum over 64 bits but since currently >>> + * the initval max column size is 6 we only use the first 48 >>> + * bits. >>> + */ >>> + if (columns > 6) >>> + return; >>> + } >> >> The comment here was for the case that we were using the old nasty >> checksum thingy I invented, prior to you adding SHA1 checksum support. >> The column limitation therefore seems artificial here ? > > Well, the comment and the 'if (columns > 6)' block can be removed. > However, the > p_columns = columns > 5 ? 5 : columns; > line ensures that we don't print the values for 'Turbo' modes. Although it can > be removed (along with the 'wide' argument) but that needs more changes. Sure. >> Also, as per Adrian's advice on the eeprom dump tool, perhaps we can >> remove clutter from the initvals tool by allowing us to copy to the >> local directory the initval files from a linux-next tag. >> >> git show next-20121204:drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9002_initvals.h >>> path/ar9002_initvals.h >> >> For example. But this would mean requiring us to get diffs by using a >> kernel git tree, separate from where we are. Not sure if there are >> gains with this strategy. Its unclear. > > Copying the initval headers from a git tree would add unnecessary complexity > IMHO. If we want to check the validity of the initval headers in a given kernel > tree, that can be achieved in a simpler way. The path which contains the ath9k > specific initval headers can be defined as an include dir while compiling the > initval tool. Makes sense. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html