RE: [PATCH v2 01/37] usb/gadget: use consistent naming scheme for usb function modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:27 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:

> >> e.g. f_mass_storage_usb.ko, f_ss_lb_usb.ko, f_rndis_usb.ko etc.
> >
> > IMHO each function should be a separate module, so this f_ss_lb_usb.ko
> > is wrong. We should have f_sourcesink.ko and f_loopback.ko.
> 
> This is true for most functions. I made serial a separate module and I
> believe all other functions can be done as well. I would probably strip
> _usb from the module name

Did you read my explanation why I introduced it? Any better ideas to prevent
circular dependency are welcome.

> the function name
> is BOT and not mass_storage

Can you explain the "BOT"?

@Michal: Would you name the f_mass_storage "f_bot"?

AP


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux