On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 07:43:54PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 08:00:11PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:23:37PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:37:29PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:32:16PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > > We now have usb_add_phy_dev(), so use it to register with the framework > > > > > to be able to find the phy from the USB driver. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Sascha, are you taking this through your tree or you want me to queue it > > > > up ? > > > > > > I would prefer if either you could take it or Alexander Shishkin along > > > with the other patches in: > > > > > > [PATCH v4] USB: add devicetree helpers for determining dr_mode and phy_type > > > > > > Could you have a look at them? Alexander is asking for an ack for 1/9, > > > 2/9, 3/9, 8/9. I just realized you are not on Cc for these. I could > > > bounce you the patches in case you don't have them in your mailbox. > > > > Ok, I'll look at them, no need to bounce. You _do_ realize, however, > > that Greg has already closed all his trees for v3.9, right ? So anything > > from now on will be queued for v3.10. > > I'm fine with that. I'm just a bit insistent because the chipidea patches are > floating around for half a year now. Once I have the warm feeling that > the patches are handled I have time ;) I'm getting ready to queue patches but, when looking at this thread, it seems like another version should've been sent. I'll skip this and look at the other chipidea threads, cheers -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
