Re: [RFC PATCHv2 00/17] First round in OTG rework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi,

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 03:20:40PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:41:51 +0300, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Non-text part: multipart/signed
> > Hi,
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > 
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:28:49AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 08:57:41AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > > > The naming needs to be decided. usb_transceiver is indeed a long name,
> > > > > but I'm not completely happy with usb_xceiv name. I would prefer
> > > > > usb_phy.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm fine with both usb_transceiver and usb_phy, but please no usb_xceiv
> > > > as it is hard to remember. What was it again, usb_xceiv, usb_xcv or even
> > > > usb_xceiver?
> > > 
> > > Felipe, do you have any comments to this?
> > 
> > no strong feelings... I just don't like to type long names :-p Maybe
> > usb_phy is ok.
> 
> In the year 2011, don't you have autocompletion and stuff in you
> $EDITOR? :)

of course not. Autocompletion and all those fancy features are for the
strong hearted ones. I couldn't, ever, trust a PC do complete what I
write :-p

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux