Hello Heikki, On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 01:09:30PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > Hi guys, > > So this would the first step where otg_transceiver is first renamed to > usb_transceiver and OTG stuff is separated into new structure, struct > otg. That's a good step into the right direction. Now people with a USB phy but without interest in otg find themselves in the code. > I would have preferred introducing the new things separately > without touching the existing and letting driver maintainers to start > using them in their own time, but if this is the way it should be > done, then here you go. > > The First two patches rename otg_transceiver and introduce struct otg. > The otg/transceiver drivers are converted each in it's own patch, but > the users are converted in singe patches, first to change the > transceiver specific function names and then to pass the struct otg > instead of usb_transceiver to otg_* functions. > > The naming needs to be decided. usb_transceiver is indeed a long name, > but I'm not completely happy with usb_xceiv name. I would prefer > usb_phy. I'm fine with both usb_transceiver and usb_phy, but please no usb_xceiv as it is hard to remember. What was it again, usb_xceiv, usb_xcv or even usb_xceiver? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
