Re: Question about Protocol code in f_acm.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--- On Wed, 9/1/10, Praveena NADAHALLY <praveen.nadahally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Praveena NADAHALLY <praveen.nadahally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Question about Protocol code in f_acm.c
> To: "linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "STEricsson_nomadik_linux" <STEricsson_nomadik_linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, September 1, 2010, 2:41 PM
> Hello All,
> 
> Does anyone have details/reasoning on the following:
> 
> Why the protocol code is set 00 in IAD and it's set 
> to 01 in ACM control interface descriptor in f_acm.c file?
> Shouldn't IAD be the same as in ACM control interface
> descriptor?

Seems buglike to me.  Almost as buglike as even
wanting an IAD given a CDC Union descriptor.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux