Hi, On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 02:47:54PM +0100, ext Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Felipe> if You look at my reply to Rupesh, I guess you would be able to use Felipe> the same character device glue to implement a f_hid.c and put a Felipe> userland daemon handling the data. How about that ? Sure, that could work, but what's the deeper reason for not using gadgetfs now we have it?
with gadgetfs, userland would have to implement also usb descriptors which makes the code a little less portable (not so true if you put usb-specific code on its own file, but anyways). Using gadgetfs also has a little performance penalty, I guess.
-- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html