On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 07:18:56PM +0530, Rupesh Gujare wrote: > Hi All, > I am new to linux-usb, and have few queries regarding "GadgetFS as a > composite function". I will appreciate if someone can explain about > it. > > I have seen following thread, which have inquired about "GadgetFS as > a composite function" feature before. > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg22744.html > > But after a lot of googling i can not find feasibility of same. > As well in kernel documentation I can find below lines :- > > "At this writing, a few of the current gadget drivers have been > converted to this framework. Near-term plans include converting all of > them, except for “gadgetfs”. > > but I am not sure why there is exception for "gadgetfs". Why would you want gadgetfs to be a composite function? What specific application do you have in mind here? And if you want gadgetfs to be working as a composite function, patches to do so would be gladly reviewed and appreciated. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
