On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:47:27PM +0530, Madhukar G wrote: > > Are you sure that really is doing what you think it is doing? > > (hint, it isn't...) > > > > Try using the correct flag here and it will work much better... > > > > I tried using IGNORE_DEVICE but i got compilation errors (undeclared > expression). Currently I'm using kernel version 2.6.14. Is this flag > not available in this version. Wow, that kernel is many years old, why are you using such an obsolete kernel for new development? I would encourage you to use a more modern kernel release. > Can you let me know the correct flag that i can use? IGNORE_DEVICE is the correct one. > > I still don't understand why you are writing a separate usb-storage > > driver for your device. Please explain this. > > > > My aim is to modify a mass storage class driver with USB attached SCSI > protocol stack (available in www.t10.org). At the same time i wanted > to have a separate driver for generic mass storage class devices. They should be the same driver, why split them apart? > The only difference between generic mass storage device and UASP > device is that, UASP device provides an additional interface > descriptor and share the same device class (USB_CLASS_MASS_STORAGE). That should not be enough to have to create a whole new driver, right? And again, why are you using 2.6.14 for new development? still confused, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
