Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: mxs: Switch to SPDX identifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:46:52AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 05/03/2018 03:26 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Honestly I'm not a big fan of the C++ comments either, I still don't
> > understand why we didn't just do something more like MODULE_LICENSE
> > which is a lot less ugly.

> Because the licensing information has to be per-file, so companies can
> easily recycle the code and be safe about the license I guess ?

I mean the format, not the specific macro.  It looks a lot less messy.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux