Hi Marek, On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote: > This C++ comment is horrid, I really hate it. If you want the first line > to be a C++ comment, while I find that terrible, I guess that's what was > forced upon everyone, but why make this whole block into a C++ comment ? > I don't think that is needed. I understand your point, but this is the style that Mark prefers: https://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg77523.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: mxs: Switch to SPDX identifier
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: mxs: Switch to SPDX identifier
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 20:51:32 -0300
- Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <a0cd91ff-0f4e-33cc-80b0-89dd97a1cbcd@denx.de>
- References: <1525288709-7934-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> <1525288709-7934-2-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> <a0cd91ff-0f4e-33cc-80b0-89dd97a1cbcd@denx.de>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: mxs: Switch to SPDX identifier
- From: Marek Vasut
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: mxs: Switch to SPDX identifier
- References:
- [PATCH 1/3] spi: imx: Switch to SPDX identifier
- From: Fabio Estevam
- [PATCH 2/3] spi: mxs: Switch to SPDX identifier
- From: Fabio Estevam
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: mxs: Switch to SPDX identifier
- From: Marek Vasut
- [PATCH 1/3] spi: imx: Switch to SPDX identifier
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: mxs: Switch to SPDX identifier
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: mxs: Switch to SPDX identifier
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: mxs: Switch to SPDX identifier
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: mxs: Switch to SPDX identifier
- Index(es):
 |