Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: mxs: Switch to SPDX identifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/03/2018 03:26 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:55:11AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> 
>> Whatever Mark prefers, but honestly I fail to see why this C++ comment
>> style ever crawled in.
> 
> Honestly I'm not a big fan of the C++ comments either, I still don't
> understand why we didn't just do something more like MODULE_LICENSE
> which is a lot less ugly.

Because the licensing information has to be per-file, so companies can
easily recycle the code and be safe about the license I guess ?

> Like Fabio says if we have to have C++
> comments I prefer the whole block being a C++ comment so it at least
> looks a bit more intentional.
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux