Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: mxs: Switch to SPDX identifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:55:11AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:

> Whatever Mark prefers, but honestly I fail to see why this C++ comment
> style ever crawled in.

Honestly I'm not a big fan of the C++ comments either, I still don't
understand why we didn't just do something more like MODULE_LICENSE
which is a lot less ugly.  Like Fabio says if we have to have C++
comments I prefer the whole block being a C++ comment so it at least
looks a bit more intentional.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux