Re: the push to get rid of CONFIG_VT in the kernel and the future of Speakup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have to agree, we need console access, not just a terminal in the
gui.  Even if we write speech dispatcher drivers for more synths, how
would speakup work then if they get rid of this interface?

Janina Sajka <janina@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> John G. Heim writes:
> > You can switch to a character user interface and use speakup even after
> > starting the graphical user interface. But as I said, I don't consider that
> > a key part of the linux  accessibility infrastructure.
> 
> 
> I have to disagree strongly, John.
> 
> But, let me phrase my disagreement this way, is the console a key part
> of Linux? Or shall we dump the console entirely in favor of a terminal
> in the gui?
> 
> If the answer is that the console needs to stay, then we need console
> based a11y.
> 
> Speaking for myself, I still spend most of my time in the console. I
> don't care for Thunderbird. And, while I routinely use Firefox, I still
> use Lynx more. I could go on, but I think I've made my point.
> 
> BTW: I also conduct most of my business phone calls from a Linux CLI SIP
> client because this gives me far better latency and far better audio
> quality than the best cell phone out there.
> 
> Just two of my BSD cents.
> 
> Janina
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup

-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

         John Covici
         covici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup





[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux