I'd be really interested actually. Thank you Alex. Take care, Sina No trees were destroyed in sending this message; however, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. -----Original Message----- From: speakup-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca] On Behalf Of Alex Snow Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:53 PM To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. Subject: Re: Gnoppernicus and remote? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 the soundcard thing can be fixed by installing a network sound daemon...If you want I can look up that particular piece of software. On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 05:47:34PM -0500, Kenny Hitt wrote: > Hi. I only played with this once for a few minutes. I used XDMCP > instead of ssh. Doing it this way meant the only thing running om my > work station was the X server. All other apps including gnopernicus > ran on the other system. Gnopernicus used the other system's sound > card instead of my work station's sound card. This should be expected. > WARNING! XDMCP isn't secure. I did this on my local network and made > sure nothing could se the XDMCP ports from the internet. > > I haven't tried using ssh, but you will probably need to have > Gnopernicus running on your work station to get it working. Start an > X session on the local box with Gnopernicus, metacity, and a gnome > terminal. In the gnome terminal, ssh to the other box and start a > gnome session. This way, Gnopernicus will speak on your local work > station and the gnome session will run on the remote box. > > Try playing with it and let us know what happens. > Kenny > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 05:55:23PM -0400, Sina Bahram wrote: > > So I could pipe both the sound from and the x session itself, over SSH? > > > > Wouldn't there then be some lag in gnoppernicus's output? > > > > I believe what WinEyes, and soon to be Jaws, does is send the text > > to be spoken over the network, and then let the client speak > > it....this way we're just sending little packets of ascii, which can fly. > > > > If I have to pipe the actual sound from gnoppernicus, I'm thinking > > there will be some serious lag? > > > > Take care, > > Sina > > > > No trees were destroyed in sending this message; however, a large > > number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
