Yeh, but I want to get it working for sending from a t3 backend to a dialup....see the problems? For me, sure I'm not anticipating any problems...but for the people I want to set it up for...there might be some. Any suggestions guys? Take care, Sina No trees were destroyed in sending this message; however, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. -----Original Message----- From: speakup-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca] On Behalf Of Alex Snow Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 10:19 AM To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. Subject: Re: Gnoppernicus and remote? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I think it only sends what sound it needs to play. and seeing how small the sounds are, and if you're on a 100mbps network, you shouldn't see a lag. On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 01:55:59AM -0400, Sina Bahram wrote: > > Thus sending the sound? or only sending what sound to be played? > > Take care, > Sina > > No trees were destroyed in sending this message; however, a large > number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. > -----Original Message----- > From: speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca > [mailto:speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca] > On Behalf Of Alex Snow > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:51 PM > To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. > Subject: Re: Gnoppernicus and remote? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > you wouldn't be piping the actual sound...you'd be using the x11 > protocol over the network. I think that's how it works... > On Fri, Aug 27, > 2004 at 05:55:23PM -0400, Sina Bahram wrote: > > So I could pipe both the sound from and the x session itself, over SSH? > > > > Wouldn't there then be some lag in gnoppernicus's output? > > > > I believe what WinEyes, and soon to be Jaws, does is send the text > > to be spoken over the network, and then let the client speak > > it....this way we're just sending little packets of ascii, which can fly. > > > > If I have to pipe the actual sound from gnoppernicus, I'm thinking > > there will be some serious lag? > > > > Take care, > > Sina > > > > No trees were destroyed in sending this message; however, a large > > number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
