Re: Sparse 0.5.1 RC5 released.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Luc,

On 14 August 2017 at 00:28, Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Dibyendu Majumdar
> <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I mean to say that I am interested in fixing the Sparse IR generation
>> - so if these are errors in the IR you spotted, then great
>
> Yes, I know.
> But I confess that doing this through sparse-llvm is kinda a pita for me :)
>
>> (I am
>> amazed at how quickly you found the errors!).
>
> Hey, I have now a small reproducer for one of the problem:
>     char a, b;
>     void c(void)
>     {
>         b = a & 1;
>     }
>
> and we can solve it and put in the testsuite to avoid future regressions.
>

I am not really sure I understand. In dmrC I get following LLVM output
for above:
; ModuleID = 'out.bc'
source_filename = "dmrC"

@a = global i8 0, align 1
@b = global i8 0, align 1

; Function Attrs: argmemonly nounwind
declare void @llvm.memset.p0i8.i32(i8* nocapture writeonly, i8, i32, i32, i1) #0

define void @c() {
L0:
  %R1 = load i8, i8* @a
  %R2 = sext i8 %R1 to i32
  %R3 = and i32 %R2, 1
  %R31 = trunc i32 %R3 to i8
  store i8 %R31, i8* @b
  ret void
}

attributes #0 = { argmemonly nounwind }


What do you get?

Regards
Dibyendu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux