On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Marko Kreen wrote: > On 8/5/09, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Sam Ravnborg<sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Thanks for hacking this up! > > > > > > I will try it out during the weekend as work permits. Busy... > > > > Any updates? > > > > It seems that top level header file including sub component > > header file is very common practice, especially on big header > > file. From the header file itself is not sufficient to determine > > the included header file is a sub component or some thing > > new. > > Could we have a flag to track top-level headers only? So that > anything declared in sub-headers will be registered also under top > header file? This seems more useful scanning mode for regular > user-space code. has anyone tried cscout? http://www.spinellis.gr/cscout/ rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday "Kernel Newbie Corner" column @ linux.com: http://cli.gs/WG6WYX ======================================================================== -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
