Re: Detect unused header files?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu August 6 2009 13:17:02 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > On 8/5/09, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Sam Ravnborg<sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >  > Thanks for hacking this up!
> > >  >
> > >  > I will try it out during the weekend as work permits. Busy...
> > >
> > > Any updates?
> > >
> > >  It seems that top level header file including sub component
> > >  header file is very common practice, especially on big header
> > >  file. From the header file itself is not sufficient to determine
> > >  the included header file is a sub component or some thing
> > >  new.
> >
> > Could we have a flag to track top-level headers only?  So that
> > anything declared in sub-headers will be registered also under top
> > header file?  This seems more useful scanning mode for regular
> > user-space code.
>
>   has anyone tried cscout?
>
> http://www.spinellis.gr/cscout/

The homepage looks interesting, but where can I download its sources?

Kamil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux