On 8/5/09, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Sam Ravnborg<sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for hacking this up! > > > > I will try it out during the weekend as work permits. Busy... > > > Any updates? > > It seems that top level header file including sub component > header file is very common practice, especially on big header > file. From the header file itself is not sufficient to determine > the included header file is a sub component or some thing > new. Could we have a flag to track top-level headers only? So that anything declared in sub-headers will be registered also under top header file? This seems more useful scanning mode for regular user-space code. -- marko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
