On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 01:17:58AM +0100, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> @@ -959,16 +959,6 @@ static int sc16is7xx_config_rs485(struct uart_port *port,
> struct sc16is7xx_one *one = to_sc16is7xx_one(port, port);
>
> if (rs485->flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED) {
> - bool rts_during_rx, rts_during_tx;
> -
> - rts_during_rx = rs485->flags & SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND;
> - rts_during_tx = rs485->flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND;
> -
> - if (rts_during_rx == rts_during_tx)
> - dev_err(port->dev,
> - "unsupported RTS signalling on_send:%d after_send:%d - exactly one of RS485 RTS flags should be set\n",
> - rts_during_tx, rts_during_rx);
> -
Hm, patch 1 in this series doesn't emit such a message, so unlike now,
users will no longer be warned that they passed in nonsensical settings...
