On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 04:24:37PM +0000, Hefty, Sean wrote: > > > I would. Mainly because it is tied to both the kernel uAPI (via > > > netlink)and to librdmacm > > > > With what little I know about ibacm I'm inclined to agree. It seems > > like a utility for librdmacm, and is consuming a kernel interface. > > > > Reconsider Sean? > > Yes - Doug made a good point. The librdmacm and ibacm share a > protocol, which I think I ended up copying into both packages. I would delete the windows support in that package if we take it into rdma-core. Is that OK? Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
