On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:12:17AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > I would. Mainly because it is tied to both the kernel uAPI (via > netlink)and to librdmacm With what little I know about ibacm I'm inclined to agree. It seems like a utility for librdmacm, and is consuming a kernel interface. Reconsider Sean? > (such that librdmacm changes how it builds when ibacm is present, so > if we don't include it, then ibacm becomes a requirement of the > larger package if you want librdmacm to support the ibacm cache > service). I double checked and I couldn't find anything like this. librdmacm/src/amc.c builds unconditionally and contains no ifdefs, configure does not key on anything to do with acm. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
